In previous chapters we have explored a relationship between vectors and integration. Our most tangible result: if is the vector-valued velocity function of a moving object, then integrating from to gives the displacement of that object over that time interval.
This chapter explores completely different relationships between vectors and integration. These relationships will enable us to compute the work done by a magnetic field in moving an object along a path and find how much air moves through an oddly-shaped screen in space, among other things.
Our upcoming work with integration will benefit from a review. We are not concerned here with techniques of integration, but rather what an integral “does” and how that relates to the notation we use to describe it.
Recall from Section 14.1 that when is a region in the - plane, gives the area of the region . The integral symbols are “elongated esses” meaning “sum” and represents “a small amount of area.” Taken together, means “sum up, over , small amounts of area.” This sum then gives the total area of . We use two integral symbols since is a two-dimensional region.
Now let represent a surface. The double integral means “sum up, over , function values (heights) given by times small amounts of area.” Since “height area = volume,” we are summing small amounts of volume over , giving the total signed volume under the surface and above the - plane.
This notation does not directly inform us how to evaluate the double integrals to find an area or a volume. With additional work, we recognize that a small amount of area can be measured as the area of a small rectangle, with one side length a small change in and the other side length a small change in . That is, or . We could also compute a small amount of area by thinking in terms of polar coordinates, where . These understandings lead us to the iterated integrals we used in Chapter 14.
Let us back our review up farther. Note that . We have simply measured the length of the interval . We could rewrite the above integral using syntax similar to the double integral syntax above:
We interpret “” as meaning “sum up, over the interval , small changes in .” A change in is a length along the -axis, so we are adding up along small lengths, giving the total length of .
We could also write as , interpreted as “sum up, over , heights given by times small changes in .” Since “heightlength = area,” we are summing up areas and finding the total signed area between and the -axis.
This method of referring to the process of integration can be very powerful. It is the core of our notion of the Riemann Sum. When faced with a quantity to compute, if one can think of a way to approximate its value through a sum, then one is well on their way to constructing an integral (or, double or triple integral) that computes the desired quantity. We will demonstrate this process throughout this chapter, starting with the next section.