When two quantities are related by an equation, knowing the value of one quantity can determine the value of the other. For instance, the circumference and radius of a circle are related by ; knowing that in determines the radius must be 3 in.
The topic of related rates takes this one step further: knowing the rate at which one quantity is changing can determine the rate at which the other changes.
Watch the video:
Related Rates #6 — Rate at Which the Circumference of a Circle is Changing from https://youtu.be/tZl5h7590go
We demonstrate the concepts of related rates through examples.
The radius of a circle is growing at a rate of 5 in/hr. At what rate is the circumference growing?
SolutionThe circumference and radius of a circle are related by . We are given information about how the length of changes with respect to time; that is, we are told in/hr. We want to know how the length of changes with respect to time, i.e., we want to know .
Implicitly differentiate both sides of with respect to :
As we know in/hr, we know
Before we look at another example, we’ll state a few ideas on approaching these problems.
Understand the problem. Clearly identify what quantities are given and what are to be found. Make a sketch if helpful.
Assign mathematical notation to all quantities, including those that are functions of time.
Create an equation relevant to the context of the problem, using the information given.
Substitute constant quantities and if necessary, use the given information to eliminate other variables.
Use the Chain Rule to differentiate both sides of the equation.
Substitute the known quantities, and solve for the unknown rate.
The important thing to remember is that you must differentiate before you substitute varying values. Otherwise, you’ll substitute a constant for what should be a variable, and it’s derivative will be zero. Consider another example.
Water streams out of a faucet at a rate of in/s onto a flat surface at a constant rate, forming a circular puddle that is in deep.
At what rate is the area of the puddle growing?
At what rate is the radius of the circle growing?
Solution
We can answer this question two ways: using “common sense” or related rates. The common sense method states that the volume of the puddle is growing by in/s, where
Since the depth is constant at in, the area must be growing by 16in/s.
This approach reveals the underlying related-rates principle. Let and represent the Volume and Area of the puddle. We know . Take the derivative of both sides with respect to , employing implicit differentiation.
As , we know , and hence . Thus the area is growing by 16 in/s.
To start, we need an equation that relates what we know to the radius. We know that . Implicitly derive both sides with respect to :
Solving for , we have
Note how our answer is not a number, but rather a function of . In other words, the rate at which the radius is growing depends on how big the circle already is. If the circle is very large, adding 2 in of water will not make the circle much bigger at all. If the circle is dime-sized, adding the same amount of water will make a radical change in the radius of the circle.
In some ways, our problem was (intentionally) ill-posed. We need to specify a current radius in order to know a rate of change. When the puddle has a radius of 10 in, the radius is growing at a rate of
Radar guns measure the rate of distance change between the gun and the object it is measuring. For instance, a reading of “55 mph” means the object is moving away from the gun at a rate of 55 miles per hour, whereas a measurement of “ mph” would mean that the object is approaching the gun at a rate of 25 miles per hour.
If the radar gun is moving (say, attached to a police car) then radar readouts are only immediately understandable if the gun and the object are moving along the same line. If a police officer is traveling 60 mph and gets a readout of 15 mph, he knows that the car ahead of him is moving away at a rate of 15 miles an hour, meaning the car is traveling 75 mph. (This straight-line principle is one reason officers park on the side of the highway and try to shoot straight back down the road. It gives the most accurate reading.)
Suppose an officer is driving due north at 30 mph and sees a car moving due east, as shown in Figure 4.1.1. Using his radar gun, he measures a reading of 20 mph. By using landmarks, he believes both he and the other car are about 1/2 mile from the intersection of their two roads.
If the speed limit on the other road is 55 mph, is the other driver speeding?
SolutionUsing the diagram in Figure 4.1.1, let’s label what we know about the situation. As both the police officer and other driver are 1/2 mile from the intersection, we have , , and through the Pythagorean Theorem, .
We know the police officer is traveling at 30 mph; that is, . The reason this rate of change is negative is that is getting smaller; the distance between the officer and the intersection is shrinking. The radar measurement is . We want to find .
We need an equation that relates to and/or . The Pythagorean Theorem is a good choice: . Differentiate both sides with respect to :
We have values for everything except . Solving for this we have
The other driver appears to be speeding slightly.
A camera is placed on a tripod 10 ft from the side of a road. The camera is to turn to track a car that is to drive by at 100 mph for a promotional video. The video’s planners want to know what kind of motor the tripod should be equipped with in order to properly track the car as it passes by. Figure 4.1.2 shows the proposed setup.
How fast must the camera be able to turn to track the car?
SolutionWe seek information about how fast the camera is to turn; therefore, we need an equation that will relate an angle to the position of the camera and the speed and position of the car.
Figure 4.1.2 suggests we use a trigonometric equation. Letting represent the distance the car is from the point on the road directly in front of the camera, we have
(4.1.1) |
As the car is moving at 100 mph, we have mph (as in the last example, since is getting smaller as the car travels, is negative). We need to convert the measurements so they use the same units; rewrite -100 mph in terms of ft/s:
Now take the derivative of both sides of Equation (4.1.1) using implicit differentiation:
(4.1.2) |
We want to know the fastest the camera has to turn. Common sense tells us this is when the car is directly in front of the camera (i.e., when ). Our mathematics bears this out. In Equation (4.1.2) we see this is when is largest; this is when , or when .
With ft/s, we have
We find that is negative; this matches our diagram in Figure 4.1.2 for is getting smaller as the car approaches the camera. What is the practical meaning of radians/s? Recall that 1 circular revolution goes through radians, thus rad/s means revolutions per second. The negative sign indicates the camera is rotating in a clockwise fashion.
We introduced the derivative as a function that gives the slopes of tangent lines of functions. This section stresses the “rate of change” aspect of the derivative to find a relationship between the rates of change of two related quantities. In the next section we use Extreme Value concepts to optimize quantities.
T/F: Implicit differentiation is often used when solving “related rates” type problems.
T/F: A study of related rates is part of the standard police officer training.
The area of a square is increasing at a rate of 42 ft2/min. How fast is the side length increasing when the length is 7 ft?
Consider the traffic situation introduced in Example 4.1.3. How fast is the “other car” traveling if the officer and the other car are each 1/2 mile from the intersection, the other car is traveling due west, the officer is traveling north at 50mph, and the radar reading is mph?
An F-22 aircraft is flying at 500mph with an elevation of 10,000ft on a straight-line path that will take it directly over an anti-aircraft gun.
How fast must the gun be able to turn to accurately track the aircraft when the plane is:
1 mile away?
1/5 mile away?
Directly overhead?
An F-22 aircraft is flying at 500mph with an elevation of 100ft on a straight-line path that will take it directly over an anti-aircraft gun as in 8. (note the lower elevation here).
How fast must the gun be able to turn to accurately track the aircraft when the plane is:
1000 feet away?
100 feet away?
Directly overhead?
A 24ft. ladder is leaning against a house while the base is pulled away at a constant rate of 1ft/s.
At what rate is the top of the ladder sliding down the side of the house when the base is:
1 foot from the house?
10 feet from the house?
23 feet from the house?
24 feet from the house?
A boat is being pulled into a dock at a constant rate of 30ft/min by a winch located 10ft above the deck of the boat.
At what rate is the boat approaching the dock when the boat is:
50 feet out?
15 feet out?
1 foot from the dock?
What happens when the length of rope pulling in the boat is less than 10 feet long?
A rope, attached to a weight, goes up through a pulley at the ceiling and back down to a worker. The man holds the rope at the same height as the connection point between rope and weight.
Suppose the man stands directly next to the weight (i.e., a total rope length of 60 ft) and begins to walk away at a rate of 2ft/s. How fast is the weight rising when the man has walked:
10 feet?
40 feet?
How far must the man walk to raise the weight all the way to the pulley?
A company that produces landscaping materials is dumping sand into a conical pile. The sand is being poured at a rate of 5ft/sec; the physical properties of the sand, in conjunction with gravity, ensure that the cone’s height is roughly 2/3 the length of the diameter of the circular base.
How fast is the cone rising when it has a height of 30 feet?