Just as polar coordinates gave us a new way of describing curves in the plane, in this section we will see how cylindrical and spherical coordinates give us new ways of describing surfaces and regions in space.
In short, cylindrical coordinates can be thought of as a combination of the polar and rectangular coordinate systems. One can identify a point , given in rectangular coordinates, with the point , given in cylindrical coordinates, where the -value in both systems is the same, and the point in the - plane is identified with the polar point ; see Figure 14.7.1. So that each point in space that does not lie on the -axis is defined uniquely, we will restrict and .
We use the identity along with the identities found in Key Idea 10.4.1 to convert between the rectangular coordinate and the cylindrical coordinate , namely:
These identities, along with conversions related to spherical coordinates, are given later in Key Idea 14.7.1.
Convert the rectangular point to cylindrical coordinates, and convert the cylindrical point to rectangular.
SolutionFollowing the identities given above (also in Key Idea 14.7.1), we have that . Using , we find that . As we restrict to being between and , we set . Finally, , giving the cylindrical point .
In converting the cylindrical point to rectangular, we have , and , giving the rectangular point .
Setting each of , and equal to a constant defines a surface in space, as illustrated in the following example.
Describe the surfaces , and , given in cylindrical coordinates.
SolutionThe equation describes all points in space that are 1 unit away from the -axis. This surface is a “tube” or “cylinder” of radius 1, centered on the -axis, as graphed in Figure 11.1.8 (which describes the cylinder in space).
The equation describes the plane formed by extending the line , as given by polar coordinates in the - plane, parallel to the -axis.
The equation describes the plane of all points in space that are 2 units above the - plane. This plane is the same as the plane described by in rectangular coordinates.
All three surfaces are graphed in Figure 14.7.2. Note how their intersection uniquely defines the point .
Cylindrical coordinates are useful when describing certain domains in space, allowing us to evaluate triple integrals over these domains more easily than if we used rectangular coordinates.
Theorem 14.6.4 shows how to evaluate using rectangular coordinates. In that evaluation, we use (or one of the other five orders of integration). Recall how, in this order of integration, the bounds on are “curve to curve” and the bounds on are “point to point”: these bounds describe a region in the - plane. We could describe using polar coordinates as done in Section 14.3. In that section, we saw how we used instead of .
Considering the above thoughts, we have . We set bounds on as “surface to surface” as done in the previous section, and then use “curve to curve” and “point to point” bounds on and , respectively. Finally, using the identities given above, we change the integrand to .
This process should sound plausible; the following theorem states it is truly a way of evaluating a triple integral.
Let be a continuous function on a closed, bounded region in space, bounded in cylindrical coordinates by , and . Then
Find the mass of the solid represented by the region in space bounded by , and the cylinder (as shown in Figure 14.7.3), with density function , using a triple integral in cylindrical coordinates. Distances are measured in centimeters and density is measured in grams/cm.
SolutionWe begin by describing this region of space with cylindrical coordinates. The plane is left unchanged; with the identity , we convert the hemisphere of radius 2 to the equation ; the cylinder is converted to , or, more simply, . We also convert the density function: .
To describe this solid with the bounds of a triple integral, we bound with ; we bound with ; we bound with .
Using Definition 14.6.4 and Theorem 14.7.1, we have the mass of the solid is
where we leave the details of the remaining double integral to the reader.
Find
††margin:
(fullscreen)
Λ
the center of mass of the solid with constant density whose base can be described by the polar curve and whose top is defined by the plane , where distances are measured in feet, as seen in Figure 14.7.4. (The volume of this solid was found in Example 14.3.5.)
SolutionWe convert the equation of the plane to use cylindrical coordinates: . Thus the region is space is bounded by , , (recall that the rose curve is traced out once on .
Since density is constant, we set and finding the mass is equivalent to finding the volume of the solid. We set up the triple integral to compute this but do not evaluate it; we leave it to the reader to confirm it evaluates to the same result found in Example 14.3.5.
From Definition 14.6.4 we set up the triple integrals to compute the moments about the three coordinate planes. The computation of each is left to the reader (using technology is recommended):
The center of mass is located at , which lies outside the bounds of the solid.
In short, spherical coordinates can be thought of as a “double application” of the polar coordinate system. In spherical coordinates, a point is identified with , where is the distance from the origin to , is the same angle as would be used to describe in the cylindrical coordinate system, and is the angle between the positive -axis and the ray from the origin to ; see Figure 14.7.5. So that each point in space that does not lie on the -axis is defined uniquely, we will restrict , and .
The following Key Idea gives conversions to/from our three spatial coordinate systems.
Rectangular and Cylindrical
Rectangular and Spherical
Cylindrical and Spherical
Convert the rectangular point to spherical coordinates, and convert the spherical point to rectangular and cylindrical coordinates.
SolutionThis rectangular point is the same as used in Example 14.7.1. Using Key Idea 14.7.1, we find . Using the same logic as in Example 14.7.1, we find . Finally, , giving , or about . Thus the spherical coordinates are approximately .
Converting the spherical point to rectangular, we have
Thus the rectangular coordinates are .
To convert this spherical point to cylindrical, we have , and , giving the cylindrical point .
Describe the surfaces , and , given in spherical coordinates.
††margin:
(fullscreen)
Λ
SolutionThe equation describes all points in space that are 1 unit away from the origin: this is the sphere of radius 1, centered at the origin.
The equation describes the same surface in spherical coordinates as it does in cylindrical coordinates: beginning with the line in the - plane as given by polar coordinates, extend the line parallel to the -axis, forming a plane.
The equation describes all points in space where the ray from the origin to makes an angle of with the positive -axis. This describes a cone, with the positive -axis its axis of symmetry, with point at the origin.
All three surfaces are graphed in Figure 14.7.6. Note how their intersection uniquely defines the point .
Spherical coordinates are useful when describing certain domains in space, allowing us to evaluate triple integrals over these domains more easily than if we used rectangular coordinates or cylindrical coordinates. The crux of setting up a triple integral in spherical coordinates is appropriately describing the “small amount of volume,” , used in the integral.
Considering Figure 14.7.7, we can make a small “spherical wedge” by varying , and each a small amount, , and , respectively. This wedge is approximately a rectangular solid when the change in each coordinate is small, giving a volume of about
Given a region in space, we can approximate the volume of with many such wedges. As the size of each of , and goes to zero, the number of wedges increases to infinity and the volume of is more accurately approximated, giving
Again, this development of should sound reasonable, and the following theorem states it is the appropriate manner by which triple integrals are to be evaluated in spherical coordinates.
Let be a continuous function on a closed, bounded region in space, bounded in spherical coordinates by , and . Then
Let be the region in space bounded by the sphere, centered at the origin, of radius . Use a triple integral in spherical coordinates to find the volume of .
SolutionThe sphere of radius , centered at the origin, has equation . To obtain the full sphere, the bounds on and are and . This leads us to:
the familiar formula for the volume of a sphere. Note how the integration steps were easy, not using square-roots nor integration steps such as Substitution.
Find the center of mass of the solid with constant density enclosed above by and below by , as illustrated in Figure 14.7.8.
SolutionWe will set up the four triple integrals needed to find the center of mass (i.e., to compute , , and ) and leave it to the reader to evaluate each integral. Because of symmetry, we expect the - and - coordinates of the center of mass to be 0.
While the surfaces describing the solid are given in the statement of the problem, to describe the full solid , we use the following bounds: , and . Since density is constant, we assume .
The mass of the solid:
To compute , the integrand is ; using Key Idea 14.7.1, we have . This gives:
which we expected as we expect .
To compute , the integrand is ; using Key Idea 14.7.1, we have . This gives:
which we also expected as we expect .
To compute , the integrand is ; using Key Idea 14.7.1, we have . This gives:
Thus the center of mass is , as indicated in Figure 14.7.8.
Given the difficulty of evaluating multiple integrals, the reader may be wondering if it is possible to simplify those integrals using a suitable substitution for the variables. The answer is yes, though it is a bit more complicated than the substitution method which you learned in single-variable calculus.
Recall that if you are given, for example, the definite integral
then you would make the substitution
which changes the limits of integration | ||||
so that we get
Let us take a different look at what happened when we did that substitution, which will give some motivation for how substitution works in multiple integrals. First, we let . On the interval of integration , the function is strictly increasing (and maps onto ) and hence has an inverse function (defined on the interval ). That is, on we can define as a function of , namely
Then substituting that expression for into the function gives
and we see that
so since
then performing the substitution as we did earlier gives
In general, if is a one-to-one, differentiable function from an interval (which you can think of as being on the “-axis”) onto an interval (on the -axis), which means that on the interval , so that and , then and , and
This is called the change of variable formula for integrals of single-variable functions, and it is what you were implicitly using when doing integration by substitution. This formula turns out to be a special case of a more general formula which can be used to evaluate multiple integrals. We will state the formulas for double and triple integrals involving real-valued functions of two and three variables, respectively. We will assume that all the functions involved are continuously differentiable and that the regions and solids involved all have “reasonable” boundaries. The proof of the following theorem is beyond the scope of the text.
Let and define a one-to-one mapping of a region in the -plane onto a region in the -plane such that the determinant
(14.7.1) |
is never in . Then
(14.7.2) |
We use the notation and to denote the area element in the and coordinates, respectively.
Similarly, if , and define a one-to-one mapping of a solid in -space onto a solid in -space such that the determinant
(14.7.3) |
is never in , then
(14.7.4) |
The determinant in Equation (14.7.1) is called the Jacobian of and with respect to and , and is sometimes written as
Similarly, the Jacobian of three variables is sometimes written as
Notice that Equation (14.7.2) is saying that , which you can think of as a two-variable version of the relation in the single-variable case.
Watch the video:
Jacobian from https://youtu.be/Bw5yEqwMjQU
The following example shows how the change of variables formula is used.
Evaluate , where .
SolutionFirst, note that evaluating this double integral without using substitution is probably impossible, at least in a closed form. By looking at the numerator and denominator of the exponent of , we will try the substitution and . To use the change of variables Equation (14.7.2), we need to write both and in terms of and . So solving for and gives and . In Figure 14.7.9 below, we see how the mapping , maps the region onto in a one-to-one manner.
Now we see that
so using horizontal slices in , we have
The change of variables formula can be used to evaluate double integrals in polar coordinates. Letting
we have
which verifies Key Idea 14.3.1. In a similar fashion, Exercises 51. and 52. ask you to verify Theorems 14.7.1 and 14.7.2 by computing the appropriate Jacobian.
This section has provided a brief introduction into two new coordinate systems useful for identifying points in space. Each can be used to define a variety of surfaces in space beyond the canonical surfaces graphed as each system was introduced.
However, the usefulness of these coordinate systems does not lie in the variety of surfaces that they can describe nor the regions in space these surfaces may enclose. Rather, cylindrical coordinates are mostly used to describe cylinders and spherical coordinates are mostly used to describe spheres. These shapes are of special interest in the sciences, especially in physics, and computations on/inside these shapes is difficult using rectangular coordinates. For instance, in the study of electricity and magnetism, one often studies the effects of an electrical current passing through a wire; that wire is essentially a cylinder, described well by cylindrical coordinates.
This chapter investigated the natural follow-on to partial derivatives: iterated integration. We learned how to use the bounds of a double integral to describe a region in the plane using both rectangular and polar coordinates, then later expanded to use the bounds of a triple integral to describe a region in space. We used double integrals to find volumes under surfaces, surface area, and the center of mass of lamina; we used triple integrals as an alternate method of finding volumes of space regions and also to find the center of mass of a region in space.
Integration does not stop here. We could continue to iterate our integrals, next investigating “quadruple integrals” whose bounds describe a region in 4-dimensional space (which are very hard to visualize). We can also look back to “regular” integration where we found the area under a curve in the plane. A natural analogue to this is finding the “area under a curve,” where the curve is in space, not in a plane. These are just two of many avenues to explore under the heading of “integration.”
Explain the difference between the roles , in cylindrical coordinates, and , in spherical coordinates, play in determining the location of a point.
Why are points on the -axis not determined uniquely when using cylindrical and spherical coordinates?
What surfaces are naturally defined using cylindrical coordinates?
What surfaces are naturally defined using spherical coordinates?
In Exercises 5–8., points are given in either the rectangular, cylindrical or spherical coordinate systems. Find the coordinates of the points in the other systems.
In Exercises 9–10., describe the curve, surface or region in space determined by the given bounds.
In Exercises 11–12., standard regions in space, as defined by cylindrical and spherical coordinates, are shown. Set up the triple integral that integrates the given function over the graphed region.
Cylindrical coordinates, integrating :
Spherical coordinates, integrating :
In Exercises 13–18., a triple integral in cylindrical coordinates is given. Describe the region in space defined by the bounds of the integral.
In Exercises 19–24., a triple integral in spherical coordinates is given. Describe the region in space defined by the bounds of the integral.
In Exercises 25–28., a solid is described along with its density function. Find the mass of the solid using cylindrical coordinates.
Bounded by the cylinder and the planes and with density function .
Bounded by the cylinders and , between the planes and with density function .
Bounded by , the cylinder , and between the planes and with density function .
The upper half of the unit ball, bounded between and , with density function .
In Exercises 29–32., a solid is described along with its density function. Find the center of mass of the solid using cylindrical coordinates. (Note: these are the same solids and density functions as found in Exercises 25.–28..)
Bounded by the cylinder and the planes and with density function .
Bounded by the cylinders and , between the planes and with density function .
Bounded by , the cylinder , and between the planes and with density function .
The upper half of the unit ball, bounded between and , with density function .
In Exercises 33–36., a solid is described along with its density function. Find the mass of the solid using spherical coordinates.
The upper half of the unit ball, bounded between and , with density function .
The spherical shell bounded between and with density function .
The conical region bounded above and below the sphere with density function .
The cone bounded above and below the plane with density function .
In Exercises 37–40., a solid is described along with its density function. Find the center of mass of the solid using spherical coordinates. (Note: these are the same solids and density functions as found in Exercises 33.–36..)
The upper half of the unit ball, bounded between and , with density function .
The spherical shell bounded between and with density function .
The conical region bounded above and below the sphere with density function .
The cone bounded above and below the plane with density function .
In Exercises 41–44., a region is space is described. Set up the triple integrals that find the volume of this region using rectangular, cylindrical and spherical coordinates, then comment on which of the three appears easiest to evaluate.
The region enclosed by the unit sphere, .
The region enclosed by the cylinder and planes and .
The region enclosed by the cone and plane .
The cube enclosed by the planes , , , , and . (Hint: in spherical, use order of integration .)
Show that for , the equation in spherical coordinates describes a sphere centered at with radius .
Let be a point in spherical coordinates, with and . Then lies on the sphere . Since , the line segment from the origin to can be extended to intersect the cylinder given by (in cylindrical coordinates). Find the cylindrical coordinates of that point of intersection.
Prove Theorem 14.7.1 by finding the Jacobian of the cylindrical coordinate transformation.
Prove Theorem 14.7.2 by finding the Jacobian of the spherical coordinate transformation.
Evaluate , where is the triangle with vertices , and . (Hint: Use the change of variables , .)