We have used iterated integrals to find areas of plane regions and signed volumes under surfaces. A brief recap of these uses will be useful in this section as we apply iterated integrals to compute the mass and center of mass of planar regions.
To find the area of a planar region, we evaluated the double integral . That is, summing up the areas of lots of little subregions of gave us the total area. Informally, we think of as meaning “sum up lots of little areas over .”
To find the signed volume under a surface, we evaluated the double integral . Recall that the “” is not just a “bookend” at the end of an integral; rather, it is multiplied by . We regard as giving a height, and still giving an area: gives a volume. Thus, informally, means “sum up lots of little volumes over .”
We now extend these ideas to other contexts.
Consider a thin sheet of material with constant thickness and finite area. Mathematicians (and physicists and engineers) call such a sheet a lamina. So consider a lamina, as shown in Figure 14.4.1(a), with the shape of some planar region , as shown in part (b).
We can write a simple double integral that represents the mass of the lamina: , where “” means “a little mass.” That is, the double integral states the total mass of the lamina can be found by “summing up lots of little masses over .”
To evaluate this double integral, partition into subregions as we have done in the past. The subregion has area . A fundamental property of mass is that “mass=densityarea.” If the lamina has a constant density , then the mass of this subregion is . That is, we can compute a small amount of mass by multiplying a small amount of area by the density.
If density is variable, with density function , then we can approximate the mass of the subregion of by multiplying by , where is a point in that subregion. That is, for a small enough subregion of , the density across that region is almost constant.
The total mass of the lamina is approximately the sum of approximate masses of subregions:
Taking the limit as the size of the subregions shrinks to 0 gives us the actual mass; that is, integrating over gives the mass of the lamina.
Let be a continuous density function of a lamina corresponding to a plane region . The mass of the lamina is
Watch the video:
Center of Mass for a Rectangle of Variable Density from https://youtu.be/5CmgNCjRVFE
Find the mass of a square lamina, with side length 1, with a density of g/cm.
SolutionWe represent the lamina with a square region in the plane as shown in Figure 14.4.2. As the density is constant, it does not matter where we place the square. ††margin:
Following Definition 14.4.1, the mass of the lamina is
This is all very straightforward; note that all we really did was find the area of the lamina and multiply it by the constant density of 3g/cm.
Find the mass of a square lamina, represented by the unit square with lower lefthand corner at the origin (see Figure 14.4.2), with variable density g/cm.
SolutionThe variable density , in this example, is very uniform, giving a density of 3 in the center of the square and changing linearly. A graph of can be seen in Figure 14.4.3; notice how “same amount” of density is above as below. We’ll comment on the significance of this momentarily.
The mass is found by integrating over . The order of integration is not important; we choose arbitrarily. Thus:
It turns out that since since the density of the lamina is so uniformly distributed “above and below” that the mass of the lamina is the same as if it had a constant density of 3. The density functions in Examples 14.4.1 and 14.4.2 are graphed in Figure 14.4.3, which illustrates this concept.
Find the weight of the lamina represented by the circle with radius 2ft, centered at the origin, with density function lb/ft. Compare this to the weight of the same lamina with density lb/ft.
SolutionA direct application of Definition 14.4.1 states that the weight of the lamina is . Since our lamina is in the shape of a circle, it makes sense to approach the double integral using polar coordinates.
The density function becomes . The circle is bounded by and . Thus the weight is:
Now compare this with the density function . Converting this to polar coordinates gives . Thus the weight is:
One would expect different density functions to return different weights, as we have here. The density functions were chosen, though, to be similar: each gives a density of 1 at the origin and a density of 5 at the outside edge of the circle, as seen in Figure 14.4.4.
(a) | (b) |
Notice how over the circle; this results in less weight.
Plotting the density functions can be useful as our understanding of mass can be related to our understanding of “volume under a surface.” We interpreted as giving the volume under over ; we can understand in the same way. The “volume” under over is actually mass; by compressing the “volume” under onto the - plane, we get “more mass” in some areas than others — i.e., areas of greater density.
Knowing the mass of a lamina is one of several important measures. Another is the center of mass, which we discuss next.
Consider a disk of radius 1 with uniform density. It is common knowledge that the disk will balance on a point if the point is placed at the center of the disk. What if the disk does not have a uniform density? Through trial-and-error, we should still be able to find a spot on the disk at which the disk will balance on a point. This balance point is referred to as the center of mass, or center of gravity. It is as though all the mass is “centered” there. In fact, if the disk has a mass of 3kg, the disk will behave physically as though it were a point-mass of 3kg located at its center of mass. For instance, the disk will naturally spin with an axis through its center of mass (which is why it is important to “balance” the tires of your car: if they are “out of balance”, their center of mass will be outside of the axle and it will shake terribly).
We find the center of mass based on the principle of a weighted average. Consider a college class in which your homework average is 90%, your test average is 73%, and your final exam grade is an 85%. Experience tells us that our final grade is not the average of these three grades: that is, it is not:
That is, you are probably not pulling a B in the course. Rather, your grades are weighted. Let’s say the homework is worth 10% of the grade, tests are 60% and the exam is 30%. Then your final grade is:
Each grade is multiplied by a weight.
In general, given values and weights , the weighted average of the values is
In the grading example above, the sum of the weights 0.1, 0.6 and 0.3 is 1, so we don’t see the division by the sum of weights in that instance.
How this relates to center of mass is given in the following theorem.
Let point masses be distributed along the -axis at locations , respectively. The center of mass of the system is located at
Point masses of 2g are located at , and are connected by a thin rod of negligible weight. Find the center of mass of the system.
Point masses of 10g, 2g and 1g are located at , and , respectively, are connected by a thin rod of negligible weight. Find the center of mass of the system.
Solution
Following Theorem 14.4.1, we compute the center of mass as: ††margin: (a) (b)
So the system would balance on a point placed at , as illustrated in Figure 14.4.5(a).
Again following Theorem 14.4.1, we find:
Placing a large weight at the left hand side of the system moves the center of mass left, as shown in Figure 14.4.5(b).
In a discrete system (i.e., mass is located at individual points, not along a continuum) we find the center of mass by dividing the mass into a moment of the system. In general, a moment is a weighted measure of distance from a particular point or line. In the case described by Theorem 14.4.1, we are finding a weighted measure of distances from the -axis, so we refer to this as the moment about the -axis, represented by . Letting be the total mass of the system, we have .
We can extend the concept of the center of mass of discrete points along a line to the center of mass of discrete points in the plane rather easily. To do so, we define some terms then give a theorem.
Let point masses , be located at points , , …, , respectively, in the - plane.
The moment about the -axis, , is
The moment about the -axis, , is
One can think that these definitions are “backwards” as sums up “” distances. But remember, “” distances are measurements of distance from the -axis, hence defining the moment about the -axis.
We now define the center of mass of discrete points in the plane.
Let point masses , be located at points , , …, , respectively, in the - plane, and let .
The center of mass of the system is at , where
Let point masses of 1kg, 2kg and 5kg be located at points , and , respectively, and are connected by thin rods of negligible weight. Find the center of mass of the system.
SolutionWe follow Theorem 14.4.2 and Definition 14.4.2 to find , and : first, kg. Next, we see that ††margin:
Thus the center of mass is illustrated in Figure 14.4.6.
We finally arrive at our true goal of this section: finding the center of mass of a lamina with variable density. While the above measurement of center of mass is interesting, it does not directly answer more realistic situations where we need to find the center of mass of a contiguous region. However, understanding the discrete case allows us to approximate the center of mass of a planar lamina; using calculus, we can refine the approximation to an exact value.
We begin by representing a planar lamina with a region in the - plane with density function . Partition into subdivisions, each with area . As done before, we can approximate the mass of the subregion with , where is a point inside the subregion. We can approximate the moment of this subregion about the -axis with — that is, by multiplying the approximate mass of the region by its approximate distance from the -axis. Similarly, we can approximate the moment about the -axis with . By summing over all subregions, we have:
By taking limits, where size of each subregion shrinks to 0 in both the and directions, we arrive at the double integrals given in the following theorem.
Let a planar lamina be represented by a region in the - plane with density function .
The center of mass of the lamina is
We start our practice of finding centers of mass by revisiting some of the lamina used previously in this section when finding mass. We will just set up the integrals needed to compute , and and leave the details of the integration to the reader.
Find the center mass of a square lamina, with side length 1, with a density of g/cm. (Note: this is the lamina from Example 14.4.1.)
SolutionWe represent the lamina with a square region in the plane as shown in Figure 14.4.7 as done previously.
Following Theorem 14.4.3, we find , and : ††margin:
Thus the center of mass is This is what we should have expected: the center of mass of a square with constant density is the center of the square.
Find the center of mass of a square lamina, represented by the unit square with lower lefthand corner at the origin (see Figure 14.4.7), with variable density g/cm. (Note: this is the lamina from Example 14.4.2.)
SolutionWe follow Theorem 14.4.3, to find , and :
Thus the center of mass is While the mass of this lamina is the same as the lamina in the previous example, the greater density found with greater and values pulls the center of mass from the center slightly towards the upper righthand corner.
Find the center of mass of the lamina represented by the circle with radius 2ft, centered at the origin, with density function lb/ft. (Note: this is one of the lamina used in Example 14.4.3.)
SolutionAs done in Example 14.4.3, it is best to describe using polar coordinates. Thus when we compute , we will integrate not , but rather We compute , and :
Since and the density of are both symmetric about the and axes, it should come as no big surprise that the moments about each axis is 0. Thus the center of mass is .
Find the center of mass of the lamina represented by the region shown in Figure 14.4.8, half an annulus with outer radius 6 and inner radius 5, with constant density 2lb/ft.
SolutionOnce again it will be useful to represent in polar coordinates. Using the description of and/or the illustration, we see that is bounded by and . As the lamina is symmetric about the -axis, we should expect . We compute , and : ††margin:
Thus the center of mass is The center of mass is indicated in Figure 14.4.8; note how it lies outside of .
This section has shown us another use for iterated integrals beyond finding area or signed volume under the curve. While there are many uses for iterated integrals, we give one more application in the following section: computing surface area.
Why is it easy to use “mass” and “weight” interchangeably, even though they are different measures?
Given a point , the value of is a measure of distance from the -axis.
We can think of as meaning “sum up lots of ”
What is a “discrete planar system?”
Why does use instead of ; that is, why do we use “” and not “”?
Describe a situation where the center of mass of a lamina does not lie within the region of the lamina itself.
In Exercises 7–10, point masses are given along a line or in the plane. Find the center of mass or , as appropriate. (All masses are in grams and distances are in cm.)
at ; at ; at
at ; at ;
at ; at
at ; at ;
at
at ; at ;
at ; at
In Exercises 11–18, find the mass/weight of the lamina described by the region in the plane and its density function .
is the rectangle with corners , , and ; g/cm
is the rectangle with corners , , and ; g/cm
is the triangle with corners , , and ; lb/in
is the triangle with corners , , and ; lb/in
is the disk centered at the origin with radius 2; kg/m
is the circle sector bounded by in the first quadrant; kg/m
is the annulus in the first and second quadrants bounded by and ; lb/ft
is the annulus in the first and second quadrants bounded by and ; lb/ft
In Exercises 19–26, find the center of mass of the lamina described by the region in the plane and its density function .
Note: these are the same lamina as in Exercises 11–18.
is the rectangle with corners , , and ; g/cm
is the rectangle with corners , , and ; g/cm
is the triangle with corners , , and ; lb/in
is the triangle with corners , , and ; lb/in
is the disk centered at the origin with radius 2; kg/m
is the circle sector bounded by in the first quadrant; kg/m
is the annulus in the first and second quadrants bounded by and ; lb/ft
is the annulus in the first and second quadrants bounded by and ; lb/ft
The moment of inertia is a measure of the tendency of a lamina to resist rotating about an axis or continue to rotate about an axis. is the moment of inertia about the -axis, is the moment of inertia about the -axis, and is the moment of inertia about the origin. These are computed as follows:
In Exercises 27–30, a lamina corresponding to a planar region is given with a mass of 16 units. For each, compute , and .
is the square with corners at and with density .
is the rectangle with corners at and with density .
is the rectangle with corners at and with density .
is the circle with radius 2 centered at the origin with density .