In previous sections we have used integration to answer the following questions:
Given a region, what is its area?
Given a solid, what is its volume?
In this section, we address a related question: Given a curve, what is its length? This is often referred to as arc length.
Consider the graph of on given in Figure 10.1.1 (a). How long is this curve? That is, if we were to use a piece of string to exactly match the shape of this curve, how long would the string be?
As we have done in the past, we start by approximating; later, we will refine our answer using limits to get an exact solution.
The length of straight-line segments is easy to compute using the Distance Formula. We can approximate the length of the given curve by approximating the curve with straight lines and measuring their lengths.
In Figure 10.1.1 (b), the curve has been approximated with 4 line segments (the interval has been divided into 4 equally-lengthed subintervals). It is clear that these four line segments approximate very well on the first and last subinterval, though not so well in the middle. Regardless, the sum of the lengths of the line segments is , so we approximate the arc length of on to be .
In general, we can approximate the arc length of on in the following manner. Let be a partition of into subintervals. Let represent the length of the subinterval .
Figure 10.1.2 zooms in on the subinterval where is approximated by a straight line segment. The dashed lines show that we can view this line segment as the hypotenuse of a right triangle whose sides have length and . Using the Pythagorean Theorem, the length of this line segment is Summing over all subintervals gives an arc length approximation
As it is written, this is not a Riemann Sum. While we could conclude that taking a limit as the subinterval length goes to zero gives the exact arc length, we would not be able to compute the answer with a definite integral. We need first to do a little algebra.
In the above expression factor out a term:
Now pull the term out of the square root:
This is nearly a Riemann Sum. Consider the term. The expression measures the “change in /change in ,” that is, the “rise over run” of on the subinterval. The Mean Value Theorem of Differentiation (Theorem 3.2.1) states that there is a in the subinterval where . Thus we can rewrite our above expression as:
This is a Riemann Sum. As long as is continuous on , we can invoke Theorem 5.3.2 and conclude
Let be differentiable on an open interval containing , where is also continuous on . Then the arc length of from to is
Watch the video:
Arc Length from https://youtu.be/PwmCZAWeRNE
As the integrand contains a square root, it is often difficult to use the formula in Key Idea 10.1.1 to find the length exactly. When exact answers are difficult to come by, we resort to using numerical methods of approximating definite integrals. The following examples will demonstrate this.
Find the arc length of from to .
SolutionA graph of is given in Figure 10.1.3. We begin by finding . Using the formula, we find the arc length as
Find the arc length of from to .
SolutionA graph of is given in Figure 10.1.4; the portion of the curve measured in this problem is in bold. ††margin: This function was chosen specifically because the resulting integral can be evaluated exactly. We begin by finding . The arc length is
The previous examples found the arc length exactly through careful choice of the functions. In general, exact answers are much more difficult to come by and numerical approximations are necessary.
Find the length of the sine curve from to .
SolutionThis is somewhat of a mathematical curiosity; in Example 5.4.3 we found the area under one “hump” of the sine curve is 2 square units; now we are measuring its arc length.
The setup is straightforward: and . Thus
This integral cannot be evaluated in terms of elementary functions so we will approximate it with Simpson’s Method with . Figure 10.1.5 gives evaluated at 5 evenly spaced points in . Simpson’s Rule then states that
Using a computer with the approximation is ; our approximation with is quite good. Our approximation of from the beginning of this section isn’t as close.
We have already seen how a curve on can be revolved around an axis to form a solid. Instead of computing its volume, we now consider its surface area.
We begin as we have in the previous sections: we partition the interval with subintervals, where the subinterval is . On each subinterval, we can approximate the curve with a straight line that connects and as shown in Figure 10.1.6(a). Revolving this line segment about the -axis creates part of a cone (called a frustum of a cone) as shown in Figure 10.1.6(b). The surface area of a frustum of a cone is
where is the average of and . The length is given by ; we use the material just covered by arc length to state that
for some in the subinterval. The radii are just the function evaluated at the endpoints of the interval: and . Thus the surface area of this sample frustum of the cone is approximately
Since is a continuous function, the Intermediate Value Theorem states there is some in such that ; we can use this to rewrite the above equation as
Summing over all the subintervals we get the total surface area to be approximately
which is a Riemann Sum. Taking the limit as the subinterval lengths go to zero gives us the exact surface area, given in the upcoming Key Idea.
If instead we revolve about the -axis, the radii of the resulting frustum are and ; their average value is simply the midpoint of the interval. In the limit, this midpoint is just . This gives the second part of Key Idea 10.1.2.
Let be differentiable on an open interval containing where is also continuous on .
The surface area of the solid formed by revolving the graph of , where , about the -axis is
The surface area of the solid formed by revolving the graph of about the -axis, where , is
Find the surface area of the solid formed by revolving on around the -axis, as shown in Figure 10.1.7.
SolutionThe setup turns out to be easier than the resulting integral. Using Key Idea 10.1.2, we have the surface area is: ††margin:
SA | |||
It is interesting to see that the surface area of a solid, whose shape is defined by a trigonometric function, involves both a square root and a natural logarithm.
Find the surface area of the solid formed by revolving the curve on about:
1. the -axis 2. the -axis.
Solution
The solid formed by revolving around the -axis is graphed in Figure 10.1.8(a). Like the integral in Example 10.1.4, this integral is easier to setup than to actually integrate. While it is possible to use a trigonometric substitution to evaluate this integral, it is significantly more difficult than a solution employing the hyperbolic sine:
Since we are revolving around the -axis, the “radius” of the solid is not but rather . Thus the integral to compute the surface area is:
The solid formed by revolving about the -axis is graphed in Figure 10.1.8 (b).
Our final example is a famous mathematical “paradox.”
Consider the solid formed by revolving about the -axis on . Find the volume and surface area of this solid. (This shape, as graphed in Figure 10.1.9, is known as “Gabriel’s Horn” since it looks like a very long horn that only a supernatural person, such as an angel, could play.) ††margin:
SolutionTo compute the volume it is natural to use the Disk Method. We have:
Gabriel’s Horn has a finite volume of cubic units. Since we have already seen that regions with infinite length can have a finite area, this is not too difficult to accept.
We now consider its surface area. The integral is straightforward to setup:
Integrating this expression is not trivial. We can, however, compare it to other improper integrals. Since on , we can state that | ||||
By Key Idea 8.6.1, the improper integral on the left diverges. Since the integral on the right is larger, we conclude it also diverges, meaning Gabriel’s Horn has infinite surface area.
Hence the “paradox”: we can fill Gabriel’s Horn with a finite amount of paint, but since it has infinite surface area, we can never paint it.
Somehow this paradox is striking when we think about it in terms of volume and area. However, we have seen a similar paradox before, as referenced above. We know that the area under the curve on is finite, yet the shape has an infinite perimeter. Strange things can occur when we deal with the infinite.
T/F: The integral formula for computing Arc Length was found by first approximating arc length with straight line segments.
T/F: The integral formula for computing Arc Length includes a square-root, meaning the integration is probably easy.
In Exercises 3–12, find the arc length of the function on the given interval.
on .
on .
on .
on .
on .
on .
on .
on .
on .
on .
In Exercises 13–20, set up the integral to compute the arc length of the function on the given interval. Do not evaluate the integral.
on .
on .
on .
on .
on . (Note: this describes the top half of a circle with radius 1.)
on . (Note: this describes the top half of an ellipse with a major axis of length 6 and a minor axis of length 2.)
on .
on .
In Exercises 21–28, use Simpson’s Rule, with , to approximate the arc length of the function on the given interval. Note: these are the same problems as in Exercises 13–20.
on .
on .
on . (Note: is not defined at .)
on .
on . (Note: is not defined at the endpoints.)
on . (Note: is not defined at the endpoints.)
on .
on .
In Exercises 29–32, find the surface area of the described solid of revolution.
The solid formed by revolving on about the -axis.
The solid formed by revolving on about the -axis.
The solid formed by revolving on about the -axis.
The sphere formed by revolving on about the -axis.